eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > CBMB > Paper 2qtl

CBMB Papers

CBMB Website

Policies

Search CBMB

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

Center for Bioinformatics & Molecular Biostatistics
University of California, San Francisco

CBMB Papers  •  CBMB Website  •  Policies  •  Search CBMB  •  Submit a Paper

Selective Genotyping and Phenotyping Strategies in a Complex Trait Context
Saunak Sen, University of California, San Francisco
Frank Johannes, University of Groningen
Karl W. Broman, University of Wisconsin - Madison

Download the Paper (807 K, PDF file) - July 28, 2008 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies can reduce the cost of QTL (quantitative trait loci) experiments. We analyze selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies in the context of multi-locus models, and non-normal phenotypes. Our approach is based on calculations of the expected information of the experiment under different strategies. Our central conclusions are the following. (1) Selective genotyping is effective for detecting linked and epistatic QTL as long as no locus has a large effect. When one or more loci have large effects, the effectiveness of selective genotyping is unpredictable – it may be heightened or diminished relative to the small effects case. (2) Selective phenotyping efficiency decreases as the number of unlinked loci used for selection increases, and approaches random selection in the limit. However, when phenotyping is expensive, and a small fraction can be phenotyped, the efficiency of selective phenotyping is high compared to random sampling, even when over 10 loci are used for selection. (3) For time-to-event phenotypes such as lifetimes, which have a long right tail, right-tail selective genotyping is more effective than two-tail selective genotyping. For heavy-tailed phenotype distributions, such as the Cauchy distribution, the most extreme phenotypic individuals are not the most informative. (4) When the phenotype distribution is exponential, and a right-tail selective genotyping strategy is used, the optimal selection fraction (proportion genotyped) is less than 20%or 100% depending on genotyping cost. (5) For time-to-event phenotypes where followup cost increases with the lifetime of the individual, we derive the optimal followup time that maximizes the information content of the experiment relative to its cost. For example, when the cost of following up an individual for the average lifetime in the population is approximately equal to the fixed costs of genotyping and breeding, the optimal strategy is to follow up approximately 70% of the population.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Saunak Sen, Frank Johannes, and Karl W. Broman, "Selective Genotyping and Phenotyping Strategies in a Complex Trait Context" (July 28, 2008). Center for Bioinformatics & Molecular Biostatistics. Paper 2qtl.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/cbmb/2qtl

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress