•   •   •   •

Download the Paper (331 K, PDF file) - March 1, 2006 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Sociology has long struggled to develop methods adequate to its theoretical understanding of society as a reality sui generis (Durkheim, 1982). While culture is widely understood as the most collective aspect of societies, the methods sociologists use keep pulling us back toward an image of culture as produced by the interaction of individual minds. To try to capture more effectively what is genuinely collective about culture, we focus here on conversational interactions—the voices and actions that constitute the relational space among actors. Hearsay ethnography provides us with a method: the analysis of texts produced by cultural insiders who keep journals of who-said-what-to-whom in conversations they overhear or events they participate in during the course of their daily lives. We describe the method, distinguishing it from other approaches and noting its drawbacks. We then explore the ways and settings in which participants in conversational interactions use culture, illustrating the methodological advantages of hearsay ethnography with examples from our texts. We end with a discussion of what we have learned about culture in action and the method’s potential in our setting as well as in other places and times.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Susan Cotts Watkins and Ann Swidler, "Hearsay Ethnography: Capturing Culture in Action" (March 1, 2006). California Center for Population Research. On-Line Working Paper Series. Paper CCPR-007-06.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ccpr/olwp/CCPR-007-06