eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > CTCRE > TCPMUS > Paper OH1998

CTCRE Papers

CTCRE Website

Policies

Search CTCRE

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education
University of California, San Francisco

CTCRE Papers  •  CTCRE Website  •  Policies  •  Search CTCRE  •  Submit a Paper

Tobacco Industry Political Activity and Tobacco Control Policy Making in Ohio: 1981-1998
Fred M. Monardi Ph.D.
Stanton A. Glantz Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco

Download the Paper (143 K, PDF file) - July 1, 1998 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:

The tobacco industry is a major political and legal force in Ohio through campaign contributions, lobbying and litigation.

The tobacco industry has become a major source of campaign contributions to legislative candidates and political party committees. In the 1981-1982 election cycle, the tobacco industry contributed $3,970 to candidates and parties. In 1995-1996, the tobacco industry contributed $55,440 to candidates and parties.

A majority of tobacco industry contributions to legislative candidates and political are contributed to the Republican party. During the 1991-92 and 1993-1994 electoral cycles, the tobacco industry contributed 54% and 53%, respectively, of their legislative and political party contributions to the Republican party. During the 1995-1996 electoral cycle, the tobacco industry contributed 77% of their legislative and political party contributions to the Republican party.

In contrast to other states, there is not a statistically significant relationship between tobacco industry campaign contributions and legislative behavior in Ohio.

Several health related groups, such as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and United Health Care of Ohio, Association of Physician Assistants, the Ohio Health Information Management Association, and Ohio Dietetic Association are represented by lobbyists who also represent the tobacco industry. This pattern of representation raises the possibility of conflict of interests among lobbyists who represent the tobacco industry and health groups.

Franklin County in 1994 and Knox County in 1995 had formulated regulations making almost all or all public places smokefree. These regulations were rejected in Ohio courts. Since these defeats, there has been no progress (except voluntarily) on smokefree public places.

Tobacco control advocates and organizations have effectively organized in preventing preemptive youth access legislation from passing in the Ohio state legislature.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Fred M. Monardi Ph.D. and Stanton A. Glantz Ph.D., "Tobacco Industry Political Activity and Tobacco Control Policy Making in Ohio: 1981-1998" (July 1, 1998). Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Tobacco Control Policy Making: United States. Paper OH1998.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tcpmus/OH1998

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress