eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > IDEA > WWS > Paper wws-rr009-1002

IDEA Papers

IDEA Website

Policies

Search IDEA

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

UCLA's Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access
University of California, Los Angeles

IDEA Papers  •  IDEA Website  •  Policies  •  Search IDEA  •  Submit a Paper

State Oversight and the Improvement of Low-Performing School in California
Heinrich Mintrop, University of California, Los Angeles

Download the Paper (1.1 MB, PDF file) - October 1, 2002 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Mintrop examines the degree to which California’s systems of public school accountability and state oversight enable the state to ensure that students in the state’s lowest performing schools have educational opportunities equal to those in other schools. He finds that California’s current system of state oversight lacks standards of adequacy for learning conditions that can potentially be evaluated statewide and that schools can use to evaluate themselves. While the state’s accountability system as currently constructed defines standards of student and school performance with the help of the academic performance index (API), the state lacks mechanisms to identify performance barriers systematically across schools that do not meet adequate performance standards, as defined by API growth targets. Many performance barriers encountered by schools are systemic, that is, caused by district (and state) policies, yet the current school-based accountability system ignores this. As a result, the state has no way of knowing what statewide policies and local interventions are needed to move underperforming schools to adequate performance levels. Further, oversight and support to schools and districts that are in need or distress according to the state’s own performance criteria are insufficient. Large numbers of schools that qualify for the state’s Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP) are not reached through state oversight or support. Moreover, there is little evidence that the state has developed effective intervention systems for a sizable number of schools and districts that have not improved sufficiently according to the state’s own performance criteria. Mintrop concludes that California lacks standards for adequate school operations, systematic mechanisms to detect performance barriers, and sufficient provision of support and intervention.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Heinrich Mintrop, "State Oversight and the Improvement of Low-Performing School in California" (October 1, 2002). UCLA's Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access. Williams Watch Series: Investigating the Claims of Williams v. State of California. Paper wws-rr009-1002.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/idea/wws/wws-rr009-1002

PREVIOUS VERSIONS:
Click a date to download that version.
October 01, 2002

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress