eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > ILE > SCL2003 > Paper ch06

ILE Papers

ILE Website

Policies

Search ILE

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

University of California Institute for Labor and Employment
University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit

ILE Publications  •  ILE Website  •  Search ILE

Living Wage Ordinances in California
Michael Reich, University of California, Berkeley

Download the Paper (205 K, PDF file) - November 1, 2003 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Living wage mandates legislate minimum hourly wages that are considerably higher than minimum wage rates. Since 1994 living wage ordinances have been passed and, in varying degrees, implemented in over ninety-five local governmental entities in the United States; among them are twenty-one California cities. The author presents a summary of the living wage ordinances in California, including their wage mandate levels and their coverage. He discusses how the minimum wage and the federal poverty standard have failed to keep up with increased living costs, especially in California’s cities, and reviews arguments for and against living wage policies. The author also surveys older academic studies on minimum wage and living wages and then discusses a new generation of research studies on the impacts of living wages. This new set of studies, which includes detailed analyses of Los Angeles and San Francisco, provides a more careful and complete understanding than was previously available. Using before-and-after surveys of employers and workers and more sophisticated methodology, they reveal that living wage policies increase pay for their intended beneficiaries without creating disemployment effects. Living wage policies also reduce employee turnover and absenteeism and improve worker performance, thereby creating some employer savings in the short run and generating incentives for productivity growth in the long run. The policies’ costs to employers and taxpayers are considerably smaller than some have projected. The author concludes by discussing recent developments in living wage campaigns that may lead to greater impacts in the future.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Michael Reich, "Living Wage Ordinances in California" (November 1, 2003). University of California Institute for Labor and Employment. The State of California Labor, 2003. Paper ch06.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ile/scl2003/ch06

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress