|
Critique of Guillermo Algaze’s “The Sumerian Takeoff”
Robert McC. Adams, University of California, San Diego
A reader's comment on: The Sumerian Takeoff by Guillermo Algaze.
ABSTRACT: Drawing upon modern economic theorists, Guillermo Algaze emphasizes continuous, interlocking, self-reinforcing processes of growth and external trade as keys to "takeoff" toward southern Mesopotamia's regional leadership in the fourth millennium B.C. But the search for historical causality, always complex, would better avoid supposed universals of individual motivation as determinate roots of behavior everywhere and concentrate in the first instance on fuller consideration of the specific context and time. Without denying a role for Algaze's factors, I suggest that ever-present risks of subsistence variability were probably more decisive in encouraging social stratification and a higher degree of regimentation within locally contending city-states there. Enhanced military effectiveness then surely played a part, alongside trade and possibly overshadowing it, in ensuing regional dominance.
KEYWORDS: First cities, Southern Mesopotamia, Competitive Advantage, Multiplier effects, Innovations, Trade patterns, Complexity
SUGGESTED CITATION: Robert McC. Adams
(2005)
"Critique of Guillermo Algaze’s “The Sumerian Takeoff”",
Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences:
Vol. 1:
No. 1,
Article 9.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/sdeas/vol1/iss1/art9
Readers' Comments
No readers' comments have been posted for this article. To submit a comment, copy the URL for this article (http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/sdeas/vol1/iss1/art9) and click here.
|