eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > IMBS > SOCDYN > SDEAS > Volume 2 > Issue 3 > Article 2

Journal home

All issues

About us

Editorial board

Aims and scope

Policies

Submission guidelines

Submit article

Contact us

Search this journal

Notify me of new papers

Structure and Dynamics logo

Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences
Social Dynamics and Complexity
Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences
ISSN: 1554-3374
University of California, Irvine


Volume 2, Issue 3 2007

Identity and Social Innovation

Duran Bell, University of California, Irvine

Download the Paper (PDF format) - February 11, 2008 Tell a colleague about it.
Get Acrobat Reader Submit a "Reader's Comment"
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing. This work has been peer reviewed.

ABSTRACT:

Foundational to this discussion are two papers on "identity" by George A. Akerlof and Rachel Kranton [2000, 2005]. We contribute to their development of this issue with additional factors that are arguably essential to the analysis of identity formation. While they indicate the importance of norms as the bases of identity, we suggest additionally the relevance of independence, individual creativity and the exploration of behaviors beyond norms. A violation of normative expectations has the potential of entering and affecting the social terrain interactively with positive feedbacks, generating non-linear processes of innovation and social change.

Our most important finding is that when individuals promote innovation in the performance of a social role, the innovation is unlikely to be mimicked by other role incumbents unless the formal rewards to those innovators are perceived to be more than proportional to the significance of the innovation. If those formal rewards are less than proportional to the significance of the innovation, a general disapprobation of the innovators may arise that potentially vitiates the benefits to innovators, retards the diffusion of the innovation and frustrates further innovation.

Contrary to Fordist notions of cost-minimization, our model suggests the development of challenging career paths where all workers of a given category are rewarded for innovation, rather than restricting rewards to specific innovators, in order to create dynamic innovative environments. Our results echo the achievements of Apple and Google, who have created heterogeneous teams of employees, rewarding all members of such teams for advancing innovation.

KEYWORDS:
identity, innovation, complexity, pareto distributions, social movements, Google, Apple

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Duran Bell (2007) "Identity and Social Innovation", Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences: Vol. 2: No. 3, Article 2.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/sdeas/vol2/iss3/art2



Readers' Comments

No readers' comments have been posted for this article. To submit a comment, copy the URL for this article (http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/sdeas/vol2/iss3/art2) and click here.



 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress