eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > Postprints > Paper 2651
Search all papers
 

notify_envelope Notify me of new papers
via Email or RSS


Postprints


Cost and cost-effectiveness of standard methadone maintenance treatment compared to enriched 180-day methadone detoxification.
Carmen L Masson
Paul G Barnett
Karen L Sees
Kevin L Delucchi
Amy Rosen
Wynnie Wong
Sharon M Hall

  Download the Article (99 K, PDF file) - 2004 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
AIMS: To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment and 180-day methadone detoxification enriched with psychosocial services. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study conducted from May 1995 to April 1999. SETTING: Research clinic in an established drug treatment program. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seventy-nine adults with diagnosed opioid dependence. Intervention Patients were randomized to methadone maintenance (n = 91), which required monthly 1 hour/week of psychosocial therapy during the first 6 months or 180-day detoxification (n = 88), which required 3 hours/week of psychosocial therapy and 14 education sessions during the first 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: Total health-care costs and self-reported injection drug use. A two-state Markov model was used to estimate quality-adjusted years of survival. Findings Methadone maintenance produced significantly greater reductions in illicit opioid use than 180-day detoxification during the last 6 months of treatment. Total health-care costs were greater for maintenance than detoxification treatment ($7564 versus $6687; P < 0.001). Although study costs were significantly higher for methadone maintenance than detoxification patients ($4739 versus $2855, P < 0.001), detoxification patients incurred significantly higher costs for substance abuse and mental health care received outside the study. Methadone maintenance may provide a modest survival advantage compared with detoxification. The cost per life-year gained is $16 967. Sensitivity analysis revealed a cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year over a wide range of modeling assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with enriched detoxification services, methadone maintenance is more effective than enriched detoxification services with a cost-effectiveness ratio within the range of many accepted medical interventions and may provide a survival advantage. Results provide additional support for the use of sustained methadone therapy as opposed to detoxification for treating opioid addiction.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Carmen L Masson, Paul G Barnett, Karen L Sees, Kevin L Delucchi, Amy Rosen, Wynnie Wong, and Sharon M Hall, "Cost and cost-effectiveness of standard methadone maintenance treatment compared to enriched 180-day methadone detoxification." (2004). Addiction (Abingdon, England). 99 (6), pp. 718-726. Postprint available free at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/2651

REQUIRED PUBLISHER STATEMENT:
www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00728.x The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress