eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > Postprints > Paper 589
Search all papers
 

notify_envelope Notify me of new papers
via Email or RSS


Postprints


Evidence-based medicine, heterogeneity of treatment effects, and the trouble with averages
Richard L. Kravitz, University of California, Davis
N H. Duan
J Braslow

  Download the Article (480 K, PDF file) - 2004 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:

Evidence-based medicine is the application of scientific evidence to clinical practice. This article discusses the difficulties of applying global evidence ("average effects" measured as population means) to local problems (individual patients or groups who might depart from the population average). It argues that the benefit or harm of most treatments in clinical trials can be misleading and fail to reveal the potentially complex mixture of substantial benefits for some, little benefit for many, and harm for a few. Heterogeneity of treatment effects reflects patient diversity in risk of disease, responsiveness to treatment, vulnerability to adverse effects, and utility for different outcomes. Recognizing these factors, researchers can design studies that better characterize who will benefit from medical treatments, and clinicians and policymakers can make better use of the results.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Richard L. Kravitz, N H. Duan, and J Braslow, "Evidence-based medicine, heterogeneity of treatment effects, and the trouble with averages" (2004). Milbank Quarterly. 82 (4), pp. 661-687. Postprint available free at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/589

REQUIRED PUBLISHER STATEMENT:
This is an electronic version of an Article published in The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 82, No. 4, 2004 (pp. 661–687).

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress