eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > UCIEM > WESTJEM > Volume 9 > Issue 4 > Article 4

Journal home

Editorial board

Print subscriptions

Submission guidelines

Images in EM guidelines

Submit article

Conflicts of interest

Concise Academic Writing

Reviewer instructions

Peer review policy

Peer reviewer training module

Journal history

Journal roles

All issues

Search this journal

Notify me of new papers

Contact us

journal_logo
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
University of California, Irvine
ISSN: 1936-9018


Volume 9, Issue 4 2008

Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
Jeffrey Sankoff MD, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery
Arnold Zidulka MD, Royal Victoria Hospital, Department of Pulmonology

Download the Paper (PDF format) - November 14, 2008 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing. This work has been peer reviewed.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives: This study describes a means of assessing the external jugular venous pressure (JVP) as an indicator of normal or elevated central venous pressure (CVP).

Methods: Intensive care unit patients having CVP monitoring were examined. With patients in bed, the external jugular vein (EJV) was occluded at the base of the neck and observed to distend. The occlusion was then removed and the vein observed for collapse. Complete collapse was hypothesized to indicate a non-elevated CVP (≤8cm of water). In those patients whose EJV collapsed incompletely, the vein was then occluded with the finger near the angle of the jaw. With the occlusion maintained, the vein was milked downwards with the other hand to cause its emptying and was then observed for filling from below. Filling from below was hypothesized to indicate an elevated CVP (>8cm of water).

Results: In 12 of the 40 patients examined, the EJV could not be assessed (EJV not seen at all: 5, and difficult to visualize: 7). For the remaining 28 patients, 11 had a CVP > 8 cm, while 17 had a CVP of < 8. EJV assessment was 100% accurate (95% Confidence Interval 88-100) in predicting whether or not a patient’s CVP was greater or less than 8 cm of water.

Conclusion: EJV assessment, when visible, is accurate to clinically assess a patient’s CVP in the hands of the author. Further studies are needed to see if they are reproducible by other observer.

[WestJEM. 2008;9:201-205.]

KEYWORDS:
CVP, physical exam

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Jeffrey Sankoff MD and Arnold Zidulka MD (2008) "Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner", Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Vol. 9: No. 4, Article 4.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciem/westjem/vol9/iss4/art4




 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress