eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > UCLALAW > PLLTWPS > Paper 5-17

UCLA School of Law Papers

UCLA School of Law Website

Policies

Search UCLA School of Law

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

UCLA School of Law
University of California, Los Angeles

UCLA School of Law Papers  •  UCLA School of Law Website  •  Policies
Search UCLA School of Law  •  Submit a Paper

Proving Rationality
Mark Greenberg, UCLA School of Law and Department of Philosophy

in Susan Hurley and Nick Chater, eds., Perspectives on Imitation (2005)

Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

There is no PDF file available for download.

ABSTRACT:
Conventional economic theory assumes that economic agents are rational decisionmakers in the sense that they act as if they were trying to maximize some one-dimensional criterion. A well-known body of experimental work has increasingly shed doubt on the assumption that human beings are rational in this sense, however. Recently, some economic theorists have tried to justify the assumption of rationality by appealing to a cultural analogue of natural selection. Robert Sugden’s interesting paper is highly critical of this strategy – the evolutionary strategy, for short. Indeed, some of Sudgen’s remarks might be read to suggest that Darwinian theorizing about cultural evolution is a sterile enterprise of “manipulating tautologies about replicators” that can have no relevance to the empirical question of whether human beings are rational. On this reading of Sugden’s paper, the evolutionary strategy is a failure, and, more generally, a Darwinian theory of cultural change – meme theory – can have no explanatory value. Sugden’s arguments, however, do not warrant this dismissiveness toward the evolutionary strategy or toward meme theory. A better way to read Sugden’s paper, I suggest, is as a plea for empirical investigation in addition to relatively a priori theorizing. The larger interest of Sugden’s paper is less its critique of a particular application of meme theory than its suggestiveness for further work in meme theory generally. Contrary to the implication of some of his remarks, Sugden’s paper itself illustrates that theoretical work on Darwinian theories of cultural change can fruitfully complement empirical investigation.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Mark Greenberg, "Proving Rationality" (September 1, 2005). UCLA School of Law. UCLA Public Law Series. Paper 5-17.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclalaw/plltwps/5-17

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress