•   •   •   •

Download the Paper (446 K, PDF file) - March 1, 2007 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
It has been claimed that a focused word may project its focus to a syntactic constituent larger than the focused item, under what are known as Focus Projection principles (Selkirk 1995; Rochemont 1998). Engdahl and Vallduvi (1996) rejected this purely syntax-based approach and proposed considering the interactions between the grammatical function and the types of an argument. Chung, Kim, and Sells (to appear) applied Engdahl and Valduvi’s theory to Korean and claimed that in Korean only a theme argument, but not an oblique argument (I.O or Locative PP), can project its focus to the Verb Phrase. This paper examines how VP focus is realized in Korean and tests Chung et al.’s claim that the types and the order of arguments can affect the focus projection (especially ‘VP focus’). The results show that there is no sensitivity to argument type, word order, or the length of VP in projecting the domain of focus to VP in Korean. Regardless of these factors, VP focus was prosodically marked by boosting the prominence of all words inside the VP, with the VP-initial word being the most prominent. Our data suggest that focus projection rules can be eliminated as proposed in Büring (2003).

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Sun-Ah Jun, Hee-Sun Kim, Hyuck-Joon Lee, and Jong-Bok Kim, "An Experimental Study of the Effect of Argument Structure on VP Focus" (March 1, 2007). Department of Linguistics, UCLA. Working Papers in Phonetics. Paper No105_5. Pages 66-84,
http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclaling/wpp/No105_5