•   •   •   •

Download the Paper (297 K, PDF file) - March 1, 2007 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
In a study of optical cues to the visual perception of stress, three American English talkers spoke words that differed in lexical stress and sentences that differed in phrasal stress, while video and movements of the face were recorded. In a production analysis, stressed vs. unstressed syllables from these utterances were compared along many measures of facial movement, which were generally larger and faster under stress. In a visual perception study, 16 perceivers identified the location of stress in forced-choice judgments of video clips of these utterances (without audio). Phrasal stress (54% correct vs. 25% chance) was better-perceived than lexical (62% correct vs. 50% chance). The relation of the visual intelligibility of the prosody of these utterances to the optical characteristics of production is discussed, with analysis of which cues are associated with successful visual perception.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Rebecca Scarborough, Patricia Keating, Marco Baroni, Taehong Cho, Sven Mattys, Abeer Alwan, Edward Auer Jr., and Lynne Bernstein, "Optical Cues to the Visual Perception of Lexical and Phrasal Stress in English" (March 1, 2007). Department of Linguistics, UCLA. Working Papers in Phonetics. Paper No105_8. Pages 118-124,
http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclaling/wpp/No105_8