eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > UCLASOC > TRCSA > Paper 28

UCLA Department of Sociology Papers

UCLA Department of Sociology Website

Policies

Search UCLA Department of Sociology

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

Department of Sociology, UCLA
University of California, Los Angeles

UCLA Department of Sociology Papers  •  UCLA Department of Sociology Website  •  Policies
Search UCLA Department of Sociology  •  Submit a Paper

Investigating the Hybridity of ‘Wellness’ Practices
Justin Lee, UCLA

Download the Paper (260 K, PDF file) - March 2, 2005 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:

Theoretically significant relationships between different categories of phenomena remain undetected because of the division of disciplinary labor. The research domains of particular subdisciplines are often bounded by common sense notions of societal sectors. In this paper, I discuss how sector-specific studies of a wide range of ‘wellness’ practices fail to recognize and address a phenomenon that cuts across sectors despite ample evidence of its existence: the hybridity of ‘wellness’ practices. Hybrid practices and establishments emerge as practitioners combine ideas and techniques from diverse sectors such as medicine and healing; counselling and psychotherapy; management, personal development and motivation; exercise and fitness; beauty and personal care services; and religion and spirituality.

I map out a program for investigating ‘hybridity’ and discuss the theoretical significance of such a project. Because ‘hybridity’ is not a property inherent in the practices themselves, but a relational concept that requires comparison between practices, I locate these practices by mapping out their structural positions within the complex multi-sectored institutional landscape. Two theoretical contributions follow from the findings of this investigative strategy: 1) It adjudicates the contrasts between theories that assert increasing homogeneity, de-differentiation, or institutional isomorphism against those that suggest greater fragmentation and differentiation; 2) It provides a corrective to the professionalization literature.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Justin Lee, "Investigating the Hybridity of ‘Wellness’ Practices" (March 2, 2005). Department of Sociology, UCLA. Theory and Research in Comparative Social Analysis. Paper 28.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclasoc/trcsa/28

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress