•   •   •   •

Download the Paper (196 K, PDF file) - August 2, 2005 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
In this paper, the strengths and weakness of randomized field ex- periments are discussed. Although it seems to be common knowledge that random assignment balances experimental and control groups on all confounders, other features of randomized field experiments are somewhat less appreciated. These include the role of random assign- ment in statistical inference and representations of the mechanisms by which the treatment has its impact. Randomized experiments also have important limitations and are sub ject to the fidelity with which they are implemented. In the end, randomized field experiments are still the best way to estimate causal effects, but are a considerable distance from perfection.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Richard Berk, "Randomized Experiments as the Bronze Standard" (August 2, 2005). Department of Statistics, UCLA. Department of Statistics Papers. Paper 2005080201.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/papers/2005080201