|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
On the Existence and Optimality of Competitive Equilibrium for a Slave Economy Ted Bergstrom, University of California, Santa Barbara This was my first published paper.
ABSTRACT: A famous paper by Conrad and Meyer calculates that on the eve of the American Civil War, slave prices were about equal to the present values of the slaves' labor services. They argue
that this is evidence for the proposition that ordinary
economic forces, without political intervention were not likely to put an end to slavery.
I wrote this paper when pretty much the only economics that I knew was 1) how to prove the existence of competitive general
equilibrium. 2) how to calculate present values. So the paper does two things. It shows how to apply Arrow-Debreu
type existence theory to an economy with slavery. (this involved some technical wrinkles that were not in the existing existence literature.) More importantly, it argues that the calculations of Conrad and Meyer showed only that capital markets for slaves were working pretty well, but were not direcly relevant to the question of whether slavery as
an institution was economically viable. To answer the latter
question, we need to calculate two things. 1) Does an
infant slave have positive present value? [If not, reproduction
would be discouraged.] 2) Would a freed adult slave, perhaps
because of the better incentives and opportunities for free
people, be able to earn more than enough on the labor market to
repay his or her market price to a slaveowner. I investigate the
latter two questions empirically. The answer to the first question is "Yes". Spotty evidence suggests that the answer to the second question was also often "Yes."
SUGGESTED CITATION:
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||