•   •

Download the Paper (427 K, PDF file) - November 4, 2003 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Some recent empirical studies, motivated by Grossman and Helpman’s (1994) well-known “Protection for Sale” model, suggest that very few factors (none of them laborrelated) determine trade protection. This paper reexamines the roles that labor issues play in the determination of trade policy. We introduce collective bargaining, differences in labor mobility across industries, and trade union lobbying into the protection for sale model and show that the equilibrium protection rate in our model depends upon these labor market variables. In particular, our model predicts that trade protection is structurally higher than in the original Grossman-Helpman model if the trade union of a sector lobbies but capital owners do not, because union workers collect part of the protection rents. On the other hand, equilibrium protection is lower if capital owners lobby but the trade union does not, because part of the protection rents is dissipated to workers. Using data from U.S. manufacturing, we find that collective bargaining, differences in labor mobility across industries, and trade union lobbying do indeed play important roles in the determination of U.S. trade policy.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Xenia N. Matschke and Shane M. Sherlund, "DO LABOR ISSUES MATTER IN THE DETERMINATION OF U.S. TRADE POLICY? AN EMPIRICAL REEVALUATION" (November 4, 2003). Department of Economics, UCSC. Paper 557.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucscecon/557