•   •

Download the Paper (314 K, PDF file) - December 1, 2003 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
A preference for negative reciprocity is an important part of the human emotional repertoire. We model its role in sustaining cooperative behavior but highlight an intrinsic free-rider problem: the fitness benefits of negative reciprocity are dispersed throughout the entire group, but the fitness costs are borne personally. Evolutionary forces tend to unravel people’s willingness to bear the personal cost of punishing culprits. In our model, the countervailing force that sustains negative reciprocity is a meme consisting of a group norm together with low-powered (and low-cost) group enforcement of the norm. The main result is that such memes coevolve with personal tastes and capacities so as to produce the optimal level of negative reciprocity.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Daniel Friedman and Nirvikar Singh, "Negative Reciprocity: The Coevolution of Memes and Genes" (December 1, 2003). Department of Economics, UCSC. Paper 560.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucscecon/560