•   •   •   •

Download the Paper (277 K, PDF file) - May 22, 2006 Tell a colleague about it. Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Our central question is: Under what circumstances can we expect a theoretically informed and reproducible measure of judicial independence de jure to be a good proxy for what we can expect to happen in reality? We argue that whether the de jure measure can be considered a good proxy for, to overestimate or to underestimate, judicial independence in reality depends on the distribution of power among the ruling political groups. Having identified those political conditions, and what Supreme Court judges can expect from them, we explore what is the likely behavior of these judges regarding decisions on cases where the government violates the rule of law or horizontal accountability. Having laid out our theoretical expectations in six different scenarios, we proceed to illustrate them using Mexico Argentina, and Chile.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Andrea Pozas Loyo and Julio Ríos Figueroa, "When and Why “Law” and “Reality” Coincide? De Jure and De Facto Judicial Independence in Mexico, Argentina, and Chile" (May 22, 2006). Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies. Project on Reforming the Administration of Justice in Mexico. Paper pozas_rios.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/usmex/prajm/pozas_rios