eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > WRC > TCR > Paper 831

WRC Papers

WRC Website

Policies

Search WRC

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

University of California Water Resources Center
University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit

WRC Papers  •  WRC Website  •  Policies  •  Search WRC  •  Submit a Paper

Microbial Denitrification of Groundwater using Microporous Membranes
Andrew R. Reising, University of California, Davis
Phillip R. McCleaf, University of California, Davis
Bruce O. Mansell, University of California, Davis
Asher Brenner, University of California, Davis
Edward D. Schroeder, University of California, Davis

UC Water Resources Center Technical Completion Report W-837

Download the Paper (1.0 MB, PDF file) - August 1, 1996 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:

Microbial denitrification, a frequently used and relatively inexpensive method of removing nitrate from wastewater, has been applied to the treatment of potable water supplies, on a limited scale, using packed bed reactors. However, two significant drawbacks exist in transferring wastewater denitrification technology to the treatment of domestic water supplies: (1) the water is intimately mixed with microbial cultures and (2) organic compounds must be supplied as an energy source to drive the denitrification reactions and residual organics can be a water quality problem. Process configurations used experimentally have included both packed beds and fluidized beds. Denitrifying microbial cultures have been supported on sand, ceramics, polymers, clay, alginate gel, and agar gel. Work with conventional support materials (sand, ceramics, polymers, clay) has been relatively straightforward in that the microbial cultures are grown on support surfaces and water containing nitrate is passed through the fixed or expanded/fluidized bed. Carbon and energy sources, nearly always organic compounds, are added to the water. Thus the problem outlined above - introduction of bacteria and organics - is characteristic of systems used to date.

The current work utilizes microporous membranes to separate the water being treated from the microorganisms carrying out the denitrification reactions. Nitrate passes through the 0.02 urn membrane pores by molecular diffusion. Water does not move through the pores and therefore contamination of the product water does not occur. Operation of microporous membrane systems can incorporate a biofilm on the reaction side of the membrane or utilize a suspended growth culture. Transport, and hence denitrification rates appear to be greater using suspended growth systems. In addition, suspended growth systems will have advantages in terms of minimization of biofouling of hollow fiber continuous flow units.

Measured nitrate diffusivities through the membrane pores was 3.5 x 10-6 cm2/s for biofilm systems and 5.0x 10-6 cm2/s for suspended growth systems. Nitrate flux is dependent on the concentration gradient. Potential fluxes for concentration differences of 20 mgIL are in the range of 10 g/m2-day.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Andrew R. Reising, Phillip R. McCleaf, Bruce O. Mansell, Asher Brenner, and Edward D. Schroeder, "Microbial Denitrification of Groundwater using Microporous Membranes" (August 1, 1996). University of California Water Resources Center. Technical Completion Reports. Paper 831.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/wrc/tcr/831

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress