eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > WRC > TCR > Paper 990

WRC Papers

WRC Website

Policies

Search WRC

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

University of California Water Resources Center
University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit

WRC Papers  •  WRC Website  •  Policies  •  Search WRC  •  Submit a Paper

Do constructed flow through wetlands improve water quality in the San Joaquin River?
Anthony T. O'Geen, University of California, Davis

UC Water Resources Center Technical Completion Report no. W-990

Download the Paper (118 K, PDF file) - October 1, 2006 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
The efficacy of using constructed wetlands (CW) to improve water quality of irrigation tailwaters was studied in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Two CWs were monitored during the 2004 and 2005 irrigation season, a new CW (W-1) and 12-year-old CW (W-2). Input/output waters from CW were collected weekly and analyzed for a variety of water quality contaminants. Organic carbon, nutrient and sediment retention efficiencies were evaluated from input/output concentrations. Results indicate that CW-2 was more a more efficient contaminant removal system for most water quality constituents. CWs were most effective at removing total suspended solids (TSS). Average TSS removal at CW-2 was 98% in 2004 and 83% in 2005. At CW-1, mean TSS removal was 90% in 2004 and 87% in 2005. Average total N removal efficiency was 41% in 2004 and 29% in 2005 for W-2, compared to 31% in 2004 and 21% in 2005 at W-1. Total P removal efficiency was 63% in 2004 and 24% in 2005 at W-2, compared to 27.5% in 2004 and 11% in 2005 at W-1. Chlorophyll-a, a measure of algal biomass, was higher at W-1, especially in input waters. Initially, in 2004, output concentration of chlorophyll- a increased, however over time, as emergent vegetation established, chlorophyll-a decreased to 35% of input levels. In 2005, CW-2 was a large source of algal biomass because vegetation was not present. Results demonstrate that CWs are effective at capturing sediment and nutrients from irrigation tailwaters, but may be a source of algae if not managed carefully.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Anthony T. O'Geen, "Do constructed flow through wetlands improve water quality in the San Joaquin River?" (October 1, 2006). University of California Water Resources Center. Technical Completion Reports. Paper 990.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/wrc/tcr/990

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress