eScholarship Repository eScholarship Repository California Digital Library
eScholarship > WRC > WRCA > RESTORATION > Paper smith

WRCA Papers

WRCA Website

Policies

Search WRCA

Submit a Paper

Notify me of new papers

institute_logo

University of California Water Resources Center
Water Resources Center Archives
University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit

WRCA Papers  •  WRCA Website  •  Policies  •  Search WRCA  •  Submit a Paper

Assessing the Feasibility of Creek Daylighting in San Francisco, Part I: A Synthesis of Lessons Learned from Existing Urban Daylighting Projects
Brooke Ray Smith, University of California, Berkeley

Also see Part II: "A Preliminary Analysis of Yosemite Creek." Prepared for LA 227 - Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Instructor: Dr. Kondolf, University of California, Berkeley

Download the Paper (1.1 MB, PDF file) - December 13, 2007

Related Files:
BRS_Appendix_A_Daylighting_Projects_Matrix.pdf (33 kB)
Appendix A: Urbay Creek Daylighting Projects Lessons Learned Matrix

Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is investigating the feasibility of daylighting historical urban creeks to mitigate flooding and combined sewer overflows in an attractive and multi-functional way in San Francisco. Examining the successes and shortcomings of existing creek daylighting projects in similar cities elsewhere in the world can provide valuable insight for potential future daylighting projects in San Francisco. The following daylighting projects share similar hydrologic, geographic, and/or urban characteristics with San Francisco: Berkeley, El Cerrito, and Albany, California; Seattle, Washington; and Zurich, Switzerland. In general, the projects in the United States were initiated by citizens, while in Zurich a city-wide daylighting program was the primary impetus. The projects reviewed tended to be located in the most economically, politically, or geographically feasible areas, representing “low-hanging fruit.” They were most often sized to accommodate the 100 year storm event. Capital costs ranged from $30-3,000 per linear foot. Community acceptance varied, but generally increased over time. In the US examples, a general lack of sufficient monitoring and maintenance pervaded

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Brooke Ray Smith, "Assessing the Feasibility of Creek Daylighting in San Francisco, Part I: A Synthesis of Lessons Learned from Existing Urban Daylighting Projects" (December 13, 2007). Water Resources Center Archives. Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Paper smith.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/wrca/restoration/smith

 
bar
Open Archives Initiative eScholarship is a service of the California Digital Library bepress