UCLA

OBJECTIVE: To help inform decisions regarding the equitable implementation of obesity interventions, we examined whether interventions were equitably reaching the most vulnerable communities, identified communities that received fewer interventions than expected, and estimated the effect of dose of interventions on obesity prevalence. METHODS: We created a database to identify and characterize obesity-related interventions implemented in Los Angeles County from 2005 to 2015 linked to community-level sociodemographic and obesity prevalence data. We ran generalized linear models with a Gamma distribution and log link to determine if interventions were directed toward vulnerable communities and to identify communities that received fewer interventions than expected. We ran fixed-effects models to estimate the association between obesity prevalence and intervention strategy count among preschool-aged children enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women Infants and Children. RESULTS: We found that interventions targeted vulnerable communities with high poverty rates and percentages of minority residents. The small cluster of communities that received fewer interventions than expected tended to have poor socioeconomic profiles. Communities which received more intervention strategies saw greater declines in obesity prevalence (β = -0.023; 95 % CI: -0.031, -0.016). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to determine if interventions are equitably reaching vulnerable populations as resources to tackle childhood obesity become available. Evaluating the population impact of multiple interventions implemented simultaneously presents methodological challenges in measuring intervention dose and identifying cost-effective strategies. Addressing these challenges must be an important research priority as community-wide interventions involve multiple intervention strategies to reduce health disparities.