Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Emergency Department Use Among Recently Homeless Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample

Abstract

Introduction: In this study we examined the association of homelessness and emergency department (ED) use, considering social, medical, and mental health factors associated with both homelessness and ED use. We hypothesized that social disadvantage alone could account for most of the association between ED use and homelessness.

Methods: We used nationally representative data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC-III). Emergency department use within the prior year was categorized into no use (27,674; 76.61%); moderate use (1–4 visits: 7,972; 22.1%); and high use (5 or more visits: 475; 1.32%). We used bivariate analyses followed by multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses to identify demographic, social, medical, and mental health characteristics associated with ED use.

Results: Among 36,121 respondents, unadjusted logistic regression showed prior-year homelessness was strongly associated with moderate and high prior-year ED use (odds ratio[OR] 2.31 and 7.34, respectively, P < 0.001). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, the associations of homelessness with moderate/high ED use diminished (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.27 and 1.62, respectively, both P < 0.05). Adjusting for medical/mental health variables, alone, similarly diminished the association between homelessness and moderate/high ED use (AOR 1.26, P < .05 and 2.07, P < 0.001, respectively). In a final stepwise model including social and healthvariables, homelessness was no longer significantly associated with moderate or high ED usein the prior year.

Conclusion: After adjustment for social disadvantage and health problems, we found no statistically significant association between homelessness and ED use. The implications of our findings suggest that ED service delivery must address both health issues and social factors.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View