Anthropogenic climate change is a global issue that manifests in impacts of disproportionate severity across communities ranging from the regional scale all the way to local neighborhood differences. To address local and regional impacts, policy and planning decision-making at the regional, national, and local scales is required. This planning may facilitate adaptation to climate change impacts, as well as mitigation efforts that prevent further detriment, or have a reversing effect. Climate change impacts are experienced as a combination of regional conditions (e.g., biome, corresponding climatic and weather patterns) and social circumstances, which vary within a given region (e.g., income level and resources to adapt to changing conditions).While anthropogenic climate change impacts such as drought and sea-level rise occur irrespective of social circumstances, environmental degradation as a whole is not always as unbiased. Environmental degradation often persists in poor communities of color, versus affluent white communities. These groups disproportionately bear the brunt of burdens associated with pollution, waste, and poor air and water quality, as a result of issues such as the historical political power dynamic, and resource disparity to either zone polluting industries out of their communities or move away from the degraded environment.Environmental justice, as a concept, aims to rectify these undue burdens in terms of environmental degradation that disproportionately affect vulnerable communities. Evolutions of the movement have sprouted focused efforts, such as that of just transitions. Just transitions have most notable applications in the energy, climate, and environment spaces, revolving around procedural and representative justice. For purposes of this dissertation, just transitions is defined as the intentionality to include those who have been historically impacted, underrepresented, or excluded in decision-making and formation of environmental- and climate-related adaptation and mitigation plans, regulations, and policies, so as to foster equitable planning with minimized tradeoffs.Core to just transitions is inclusion, which can be operationalized through participation. Participation in decision-making processes not only increases representational equity in terms of embodiment of the full range of perspectives of those affected by a decision, but also increases procedural equity through the involvement of those perspectives within each step of the process. However, it can be difficult for decision-making bodies to determine when participation engagement is necessary, and how to facilitate engagement.Participatory scenario planning is a decision-making support tool that facilitates such engagement between the decision-makers and those affected by decision outcomes, often rendering these groups as one in the same. Participatory scenario planning approaches decision options as scenarios - narratives of plausible futures. Consideration of different scenarios allows fruitful thought surrounding a) decision-making options, b) pathways to achieve each option, c) benefits of the options, and d) consequences of the options. Employing participatory scenario planning therefore has the potential to produce informed, well-rounded decisions that, if facilitated and executed correctly, consider all relevant perspectives to maximize benefits and minimize trade-offs in decision-making. Participatory scenario planning offers flexibility and customization to employ engagement strategies most relevant and useful for each individual process. One limitation of participatory scenario planning, however, is its lack of defined methodologies for modeling the scenarios under consideration; literature varies in the extent of modeling undertaken, if at all, and type of modeling. Therefore, the process of deciding upon a given scenario is highly variable across exercises.Another decision-making support tool, life cycle assessment (LCA), is a standardized modeling tool that is often employed in the energy, climate, and environmental fields to gain insight on the impacts a given decision has on human health, the environment, and natural resources. As outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), LCA practitioners follow a formal methodology for modeling impacts. However, this methodology does not specify any participatory components; as such, there lacks a true participatory-LCA (p-LCA) framework in the literature, and p-LCA attempts to date have been inconsistent in their engagement methods.Combining participatory scenario planning with LCA to create a formal p-LCA framework produces a decision-making support tool that offers flexibility and customization while maintaining a standardized methodology, incorporating robust modeling, and combines qualitative insights with quantitative data to inform decisions. In this framework, individuals with a vested interest in the outcome of decisions have the opportunity to voice their perspectives and maintain ownership over the decision-making process, while still abiding to a clear order of operations to produce quantitative insights. In this way, the p-LCA framework will increase just transitions in the climate change decision-making space, while providing valuable decision-making data.This dissertation explores the fusion of participatory scenario planning and LCA to produce a formal p-LCA framework. The six chapters contribute to this exploration as follows: Chapter 1. Introduction. The first chapter introduces the overarching concepts of environmental justice, just transitions, and climate management strategies. The goal of this chapter is to level-set the contextual information as the foundation the dissertation relies on. The context is both historical and definitional. Concept history is explored to establish an understanding of the origins and evolution of central topics. Definitions are set for potentially ambiguous terms, or terms with varying definitions per field of application (for example, just transitions, or climate management decision-making) to ensure the intended interpretation is carried forward throughout the dissertation.Chapter 2. Participatory Scenario Planning as Applied to Climate Management Strategies. The second chapter in this dissertation employs a systematic review of the literature surrounding participatory scenario planning as applied to decision-making related to climate change. The intent of this chapter is to explore common practices from the literature, in order to suggest elements of participatory scenario planning methodology for implementation into the overall p-LCA framework.Chapter 3. Perceptions of Just Transitions in Participatory Scenario Planning of Salinity Management in the Delta. After establishing common practices in participatory scenario planning as applied to climate management decision-making, perception of actual climate management participatory scenario planning participants is explored through a case study, employing insights from the Just Transitions in the Delta: Drought, Salinity, and Sea Level Rise (hereafter "Just Transitions in the Delta") project. Analyzing survey responses to comments on perceptions of inclusion, equity, and justice related to the participatory scenario planning process and decision-making as a whole serve to determine the utility of employing participatory scenario planning processes through the lens of real-world participants.Chapter 4. Fusing Qualitative and Quantitative Practices for Climate Management Strategies. Chapter 4 establishes a proposed p-LCA framework through combination of the ISO LCA standardized methodology, and the common practices of participatory scenario planning gleaned from Chapter 2. Chapter 5. P-LCA of Salinity Management Strategies in the Delta.Chapter 5 serves as a proof-of-concept of the p-LCA framework established in Chapter 4, again through a case study involving the Just Transitions in the Delta research project. The p-LCA executed explores two alternative scenarios for salinity management in the face of climate change. Chapter 6. Conclusions & Recommendations. Chapter 6 concludes the dissertation, highlighting the pertinent results of each chapter, and provides further recommendations.The findings of Chapter 2 highlight common practices in participatory scenario planning processes, and insights into useful engagement strategies. Chapter 3 results confirm public acceptance and perceived utility and even enjoyment of the participatory scenario planning process, echoing findings from Chapter 2. Chapter 4 provides a pathway to fuse participatory scenario planning with LCA for a new p-LCA framework, to both bring a standardized modeling methodology to participatory scenario planning processes, and incorporate participation in the LCA process, for purposes of increasing representational and procedural equity in climate management decision-making for a just transition. Results of the proof-of-concept executed in Chapter 5 shows the p-LCA framework defined in Chapter 4 is both feasible to implement and useful in climate adaptation decision-making.