Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

A Duty to Protect and Respect: Seneca Opposition to Incorporation during the Removal Period

Abstract

When pressured to remove after the 1830 Indian Removal Act, some from among the Seneca appealed to the federal government to prevent displacement. In these letters and petitions, their authors periodically invoked the notion of protection, an instrument of cross-cultural diplomatic encounters of the previous century. Seneca authors sought to defend their tribe against settler takeover by invoking two different kinds of protection, external and internal. They further drew upon a civil right, petitioning, although originally it had been a method of exclusion from full political rights, and rejected the legal incorporation forced upon American Indians through the “domestic dependent nations” ruling.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View